Re: More D2W basics
Re: More D2W basics
- Subject: Re: More D2W basics
- From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:40:47 -0400
On 2010-06-14, at 4:28 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
> On 2010-06-14, at 4:11 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote:
>
>> That's what I thought. I tried a full page reload to force the update, and the page comes back as it was, with the performance details.
>>
>> <Screen shot 2010-06-14 at 4.06.40 PM.png>
>
> How is that to-one modelled? i.e: This 'should' work fine, let me double check but I think what you are seeing is atypical.
Yeah, I just tested with an optional to-one in a current project and it worked fine.
So I'm not sure what you are seeing here.
>
>>
>> If I then save I get this:
>>
>> <Screen shot 2010-06-14 at 4.04.11 PM.png>
>
> I keep meaning to make the validation markers work better with more complex property level components...
>
>> I noticed that if the window is narrower, the new and search buttons in the Performance div are hidden under the contents of the div. Of course that doesn't explain why those contents are there anyway, as the relationship should have been removed. Part of this looks like a CSS bug. Though Ajax might not be clearing out the old values, even if they'd been removed from the relationship in the ec. I am not much of a javascript guy (I rely on Wonder, etc. to do that stuff for me whenever possible) I'll look at it to the best of my abilities though.
>
> Width, yeah. I didn't want to specify a fixed width for anything as that would really depend on your usage, but that means there is no 'minimum' and things have a tendency to act weird when you reduce the window below the size of your content.
>
> YMMV, leave that as an exercise for the reader, etc.
>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:48 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2010-06-14, at 3:40 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote:
>>>
>>>> I used that rule, and unchecked my old rule. It worked! Thanks. However, now I am having issues if I want to delete the related performance (more precisely, remove that performance). I click remove, and the page does not refresh and continues to show the old related performance (though apparently the relationship has been removed, because saving causes an error . . . missing the required relationship).
>>>
>>> The ERMActionButtons (inspect, remove, delete, etc) perform ajax updates.
>>>
>>> You might want to try and debug that in FireFox/FireBug to see if there is something breaking.
>>
>
> ;david
>
> --
> David LeBer
> Codeferous Software
> 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
> site: http://codeferous.com
> blog: http://davidleber.net
> profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
> twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
> --
> Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
> http://tacow.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
;david
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden