Re: Scala and WebObjects
Re: Scala and WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
- From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:50:12 +0000
>> The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO when you can simply extend it.
>
> I think the problem is obviously more "political" than technical. Technically you are correct in that WebObjects is extensible with or without PW.
Seconded. I'm currently working at a company where I'm pretty free to use any java libraries I want to. However, due to that rather silly "you have to develop on a Mac"-clause in the WO license I *can't* introduce WO into the environment, since we've got all types of computers. And this is frustrating, because almost every day I find myself re-implementing functionality I could be using from JavaFoundation and Project Wonder.
I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to use WO.
*sigh*. I keep having these wet dreams where I check wo-dev and find that Apple's stuck JavaFoundation, WO and EOF up on github.
Cheers,
- hugi _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden