Re: Lion and WO
Re: Lion and WO
- Subject: Re: Lion and WO
- From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:45:15 -0700
Now that right there IS funny. But if no one were on the list to see that and laugh, then I'd have to develop in something other than WO. :-)
Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS
On Jul 25, 2011, at 8:36 PM, John Huss wrote:
> I don't know what I would do if I was using some proprietary technology that hadn't been updated in years, with almost no communication from the company in charge of it! What is that like? ;-)
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tim Worman <email@hidden> wrote:
> Openbase has been a great product from day one. And integrating it with WO definitely is seamless. I'm a fan. But the developer list has fallen completely silent and it used to be vibrant. The product hasn't had any public updates since 2009 - I don't think it is because there is nothing to do.
>
> I'm in no hurry at all to move my server but I do have to develop against something and that can't be Openbase if I'm running Lion. The tweet indicating that a beta has been "released" is one of only two from the company since Feb 2010.
>
> Tim Worman
> UCLA GSE&IS
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden