Re: WOGWT adaptor
Re: WOGWT adaptor
- Subject: Re: WOGWT adaptor
- From: Michael DeMan <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:17:43 -0700
see inline.
On May 20, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Michael DeMan wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Thanks for the follow up.
>>
>> The bottom line is that for the current contract that I am on, WO is plagued in two (of the same old) areas:
>>
>> 1) Lack of developers. As we all know, its a pretty tiny marketplace. The people generally are top notch, but nonetheless for a large company they need from a risk management perspective to know that they can find people, whether current employees or run over a bus, find more interesting things to do in life - or whatever.
>
> There are still some of use contractors out here. :-)
>
> Chuck
>
Yes, I know. The problem is more related to staffing in regards to full time junior software developers and such. Basically, because of the tiny market share WO has, a lot of younger folks perceive it (correctly) as some kind of oddball technology. With a mobile workplace, even kids straight out of college are concerned about what their resume will look like after 3-5 years on a full time job. Yes, a catch-22 I agree.
- Mike
P.S. - sorry for the slow reply, catching up on emails.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden