Re: WOGWT adaptor
Re: WOGWT adaptor
- Subject: Re: WOGWT adaptor
- From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:35:12 -0400
Le 2011-05-23 à 20:17, Michael DeMan a écrit :
> see inline.
>
> On May 20, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 19, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Michael DeMan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the follow up.
>>>
>>> The bottom line is that for the current contract that I am on, WO is plagued in two (of the same old) areas:
>>>
>>> 1) Lack of developers. As we all know, its a pretty tiny marketplace. The people generally are top notch, but nonetheless for a large company they need from a risk management perspective to know that they can find people, whether current employees or run over a bus, find more interesting things to do in life - or whatever.
>>
>> There are still some of use contractors out here. :-)
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>
> Yes, I know. The problem is more related to staffing in regards to full time junior software developers and such. Basically, because of the tiny market share WO has, a lot of younger folks perceive it (correctly) as some kind of oddball technology. With a mobile workplace, even kids straight out of college are concerned about what their resume will look like after 3-5 years on a full time job. Yes, a catch-22 I agree.
Or they think we are retarded, just like when at college we looked at COBOL and mainframes people and says in our head "How on Earth does those people can work with such tools". Now, it's PHP/Ruby would look at Java people and says "those people are outdated". And in 5 years, people will look at PHP people and says "are you nuts?".
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden