Re: Maven
Re: Maven
- Subject: Re: Maven
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:46:18 -0800
On 2011-11-16, at 2:26 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
> Aloha over there in Bhutranio!
>
>> There's TWO WebObjects developers on Iceland?!
>
> There are more. "Atli Páll" is the pseudonym our 2000+ strong Icelandic iTunes Store slave labor camp posts under.
Every person in Iceland works on iTunes?!!? :-P
>> Are you real, or just the corporeal manifestation of the second, blurry Hugi
>
> I'm not blurry, I'm big boned.
After two beers, everything is burry to David.
>> Ant is pretty simple. Mostly I don't even think about the Ant portion of my WO projects other than to tell Hudson that it has to issue an Ant command to build the project.
>
> Before you can even think about building WO projects using Ant you have to at least have woproject.jar in your Ant plugin classpath. And then, the only reason you don't think much about Ant is that Someone Else wrote a >200 line Ant script for you (that you are required to copy verbatim for each and every WO project you create. How's that for reusability).
As opposed to copying and editing a pom.xml?
>> How is Maven more simple than that? It always seems like Maven becomes an active part of your project as opposed to being a background thing.
>
> Well, the whole "background thing" during development, that makes WO development great has nothing to do with Ant. That's enabled by WOLips, Eclipse, and a lot of work from great people.
Truth.
> The initial setup of a Maven environment for WO development may take an hour or two—that's because WO is proprietary and thus requires some installation. But once your environment is properly set up, Maven works great. I started out the easy way—just added a "pom.xml" to my standard frameworks alongside the "build.xml"-files (like Project Wonder does). But eventually, you'll want to use all the amazing features Maven has to offer.
Like having to edit each pom when you make a new non-SNAPSHOT version?
>
> And it's so much simpler than the 200+ lines of procedural code every single simple little WO application requires to even build with Ant.
But you don't have to mess with that.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maven
- From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <email@hidden>
- Re: Maven
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Re: Maven
- From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >Maven (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Atli Páll Hafsteinsson <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden>) |