Re: Maven
Re: Maven
- Subject: Re: Maven
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:07:18 -0800
On 2011-11-16, at 2:54 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
> Hello;
>
> On 17/11/11 11:42 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> > That has been pretty much my experience with it. When it "just
> > works" it is great. But...
>
> Yes maven is very 'not fun' when it doesn't "just work".
>
> It's interesting (to me) that the disadvantage in ant is maven's advantage and the disadvantage in maven is ant's advantage.
I think that means they are both the wrong answer. I am certainly no fan of Ant.
> I heard or read that 'ant with ivy' is a good middle ground, but I haven't had the opportunity to try that yet; anybody else?
I've very briefly looked at it and then went back to solving problems that I actually had.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Maven (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Maven (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>) |