Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
- Subject: Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
- From: Gino Pacitti <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:33:05 +0100
Thanks Pascal, it sounds like you are pretty frustrated with Apple.
I think that as a Community though that this is one of the topics that
might need resolving.
Or Apple is dropped from the equation completely and the WO Community
gets organized so that a structure exists for financing and allocation
of resources.
I would love to contribute but I don't think my code would benefit in
any way as there are better programmers with better understanding of
the needs.
I still would like to contribute to a membership scheme though in some
financial way if there was a roadmap to work towards...
Gino
On 28 Mar 2012, at 11:08, Pascal Robert wrote:
Has the WOCommunity spoke directly to Apple about this?
Listen, many things have been done, and none worked. If you think
you change the situation, go ahead, but I'm not going to do anything
more because I know it won't work. I stopped waiting for the messiah
18 months ago and I prefer to actually going forward than waiting
for something that won't happen.
They obviously share in Wonder Code and surely they would not deny
the WOCommunity code on that basis?
Have you seen Apple code in Wonder that was committed in the last 12
months? No? You have the answer.
On 28 Mar 2012, at 10:54, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2012-03-28 à 05:31, Gino Pacitti a écrit :
So do they extend its functionality and then do not release the
code?
Looks like it.
On 28 Mar 2012, at 10:27, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2012-03-28 à 05:24, Gino Pacitti a écrit :
Well I for one would like to have some sort of contribution
scheme fixed on an annual membership for development etc...
And just so I am not too behind on what is the current state of
the union - what is the Apple current think on WO. I think I
read here that they are no longer contributing to its
development. Is that correct? Any one know of their plans for
the software?
They keep it for themselves, and it won't change, plain and
simple. Many things have been done to try to change that, and
nothing worked.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden