Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
- Subject: Re: Apple and WO (Google Moderator thread)
- From: ISHIMOTO Ken <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:57:10 +0200
Hi Gino,
> I would love to contribute but I don't think my code would benefit in any way as there are better programmers with better understanding of the needs.
There are always better programmers out there, but if we can contribute code, and bring nice ideas to the Community, it will helps the Community.
Also if better programmers fix some mistake than the not so good programmer can learn what fixes was done to the contributed code.
And next time the contribute will be better.
I work now for 5 years on WO really every day, but everyday I can learn new stuff. Because it is a Never Ending Learning Story.
I also have about 7-8 Frameworks, some are older and not nice anymore, but it has functions and ideas that not exists in wonder yet,
after contribute some people will find it useful and make it better. that is a win & win situation, I believe.
Ken
On 2012/03/28, at 12:33, Gino Pacitti wrote:
> Thanks Pascal, it sounds like you are pretty frustrated with Apple.
>
> I think that as a Community though that this is one of the topics that might need resolving.
>
> Or Apple is dropped from the equation completely and the WO Community gets organized so that a structure exists for financing and allocation of resources.
>
> I would love to contribute but I don't think my code would benefit in any way as there are better programmers with better understanding of the needs.
>
> I still would like to contribute to a membership scheme though in some financial way if there was a roadmap to work towards...
>
> Gino
>
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2012, at 11:08, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>>> Has the WOCommunity spoke directly to Apple about this?
>>
>> Listen, many things have been done, and none worked. If you think you change the situation, go ahead, but I'm not going to do anything more because I know it won't work. I stopped waiting for the messiah 18 months ago and I prefer to actually going forward than waiting for something that won't happen.
>>
>>> They obviously share in Wonder Code and surely they would not deny the WOCommunity code on that basis?
>>
>> Have you seen Apple code in Wonder that was committed in the last 12 months? No? You have the answer.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 Mar 2012, at 10:54, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 2012-03-28 à 05:31, Gino Pacitti a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> So do they extend its functionality and then do not release the code?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 Mar 2012, at 10:27, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 2012-03-28 à 05:24, Gino Pacitti a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well I for one would like to have some sort of contribution scheme fixed on an annual membership for development etc...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And just so I am not too behind on what is the current state of the union - what is the Apple current think on WO. I think I read here that they are no longer contributing to its development. Is that correct? Any one know of their plans for the software?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They keep it for themselves, and it won't change, plain and simple. Many things have been done to try to change that, and nothing worked.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>>
>>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden