I guess it will be in the not-very-open TreasureBoard. Nobody cares about Wonder anymore.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Daniel D CIV NAVAIR Beatty, 474300D" <
email@hidden>
À: "
email@hidden" <
email@hidden>
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:07:11
Objet: RE: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
Hi gang,
I seem to remember talk amongst the project wonder gang that we might actually refactor Wonder to use a pseudo-web-objects. If looks like WO, smells like WO, but legally not WO could Wonder be the owner?
V/R,
Daniel Beatty, Ph.D.,
IEEE Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP)
Computer Scientist
Code 474300D
1 Administration Circle. M/S 1109
China Lake, CA 93555
email@hidden
(760)939-7097
-----Original Message-----
From:
webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=email@hidden [
mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Troy Lumasag
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:15 PM
To:
email@hidden
Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
Hey guys,
What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being as it is now?
I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
1. porting issues(moving to future java versions) 2. single-threaded editing context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup?
Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha
--Troy
On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:
WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening because it is a internal business advantage.
Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS
On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:
On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden> wrote:
Apple cares about money, not us.
Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... oh, wait.
Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.
(i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.
(ii) then they stop bundling it.
(iii) then they stop supporting it at all.
All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put it to open source at the same moment?!?
The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to public (see Darwin).
Oh, sigh.
About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is
that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual
'varsity freaks pastime :)
- hugi
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-op
en-source.aspx
The github is here
https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
my.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
l.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to
email@hidden