• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source


  • Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:58:29 -0500

I still use the regular distribution…

On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Pascal Robert <email@hidden> wrote:

And no leadership. Also, at WOWODC 2014, almost everyone said that they are using their own forks.


De: "Chuck Hill" <email@hidden>
À: "Ken Anderson" <email@hidden>, "Pascal Robert" <email@hidden>
Cc: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:42:00
Objet: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

I think he means there have not been a lot of new additions or work done on it lately.



On 2015-02-05, 1:13 PM, "Ken Anderson" wrote:

Nobody cares about WOnder anymore?  You feeling OK Pascal?

On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Pascal Robert <email@hidden> wrote:

I guess it will be in the not-very-open TreasureBoard. Nobody cares about Wonder anymore.

----- Mail original -----
De: "Daniel D CIV NAVAIR Beatty, 474300D" <email@hidden>
À: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:07:11
Objet: RE: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

Hi gang,
I seem to remember talk amongst the project wonder gang that we might actually refactor Wonder to use a pseudo-web-objects.   If looks like WO, smells like WO, but legally not WO could Wonder be the owner?

V/R,

Daniel Beatty, Ph.D., 
IEEE Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP)
Computer Scientist
Code 474300D
1 Administration Circle. M/S 1109
China Lake, CA 93555
email@hidden
(760)939-7097 



-----Original Message-----
From: webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=email@hidden [mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Troy Lumasag
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:15 PM
To: email@hidden
Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

Hey guys,

What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being as it is now?
I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
1. porting issues(moving to future java versions) 2. single-threaded editing context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup?

Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha

--Troy

On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:
WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening because it is a internal business advantage.

Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS

On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <email@hidden> wrote:

On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <email@hidden> wrote:
Apple cares about money, not us.
Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... oh, wait.

Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.

(i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.

(ii) then they stop bundling it.

(iii) then they stop supporting it at all.

All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put it to open source at the same moment?!?

The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to public (see Darwin).

Oh, sigh.

About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is 
that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 
'varsity freaks pastime :)

- hugi



http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-op
en-source.aspx

The github is here

https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr

It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
my.com

This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
l.com

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >[OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Troy Lumasag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • Next by Date: Re: R/R loop 101: how to trigger a subcomponent method before appendToResponse?
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • Next by thread: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread