Re: wotaskd reliability
Re: wotaskd reliability
- Subject: Re: wotaskd reliability
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:28:37 +0000
- Thread-topic: wotaskd reliability
Crashing or hanging? Those are different. If it is crashing, do you have a stack trace? Is it hard exit? If it is hanging, get a thread dump (sudo jstack -f <pid>). Or is it your app that is hanging? If the app takes too long to respond to a wotaskd request, it can appear that the problem is with wotaskd.
I did a session on wotaskd in 2014 that might help you to diagnose this. I don’t see it on the WOCommunity site, but you can find it via Google, e.g http://www.podcastchart.com/podcasts/webobjects-podcasts/episodes/wotaskd-internals-bringing-sanity-to-deployment
Chuck
On 2015-11-29, 10:19 AM, "webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden on behalf of Michael Kondratov" <webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden on behalf of email@hidden> wrote:
>Hello,
> What is the most reliable deployment set up at this time? It seems we are having occasional issues with wotaskd crashing or hanging. We are on Mac Os X 10.9 Server. Would we gain anything from using SiteConfig.xml for Apache Adaptor instead of wotaskd?
>
>Thank you!
>
>Michael Kondratov
>Aspire Auctions
> _______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden