Re: wotaskd reliability
Re: wotaskd reliability
- Subject: Re: wotaskd reliability
- From: Michael Kondratov <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:30:35 -0500
Sounds like something is using up too much memory.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Jeff Schmitz <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> After a couple of days running an app with virtually no load, my El Capitan server has been completely locking up every few hours to where I can’t even ssh in, requiring a remote power cycle to bring it back to life. I may try a remote linux install using some combination of these pages:
>
> http://www.houseoflinux.com/installation/how-to-remote-install-centos-6-via-vnc/
> https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3876
> https://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/documentation/Installing+a+deployment+environment+on+RedHat,+CentOS+or+Amazon+Linux
>
>
>
>> On Nov 29, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Michael Kondratov <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The server load stays pretty low at around 10%-15% on a 6 core Mac Pro. I’ve noticed that wotaskd starts up with 64MB max heap. Is it an acceptable amount for a 64bit system?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 29, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Chuck Hill <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> If it is load related, I’d look at the application first. You might also be running low on file handles or other system resources. Linux is likely better configured in that respect.
>>>
>>> WO should easily be able to handle that load, but that assumes that the application does not have have issues with the load.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 2015-11-29, 12:09 PM, "webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden on behalf of Michael Kondratov" <webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden on behalf of email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We start having issues right about 100k page views per day. Is it reasonable to believe WO should handle it without breaking a sweat? What makes Linux better than OS X?
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Pascal Robert <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 2015-11-29 à 13:19, Michael Kondratov <email@hidden> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> What is the most reliable deployment set up at this time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems we are having occasional issues with wotaskd crashing or hanging. We are on Mac Os X 10.9 Server. Would we gain anything from using SiteConfig.xml for Apache Adaptor instead of wotaskd?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Kondratov
>>>>>> Aspire Auctions
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden