Re: Build strangeness, I am completely stumped
Re: Build strangeness, I am completely stumped
- Subject: Re: Build strangeness, I am completely stumped
- From: Markus Ruggiero <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:57:58 +0200
Fabian, you're the hero
Thanks, that was it
> On 13.04.2016, at 15:07, Fabian Peters <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I'd say this is caused by the dreaded WOBootstrap.jar being absent in the customer build environment. When it is absent, the pre-5.2 startup script is being used.
> That being said, the old script works fine for me, as long as HOME and NEXT_ROOT are set and _all_ framework dependencies are embedded.
>
> For some context and various hints what to do: <https://www.google.com/search?q=woapp+woapp_52>
>
> Fabian
>
>> Am 13.04.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Markus Ruggiero <email@hidden>:
>>
>> Hi lis,
>>
>> I have 2 similar environments:
>>
>> my local rMBP with OS X 10.11.4, Eclipse 4.5.1 (Mars.1) with WOLips 4.4.20150826.46
>> customer machine Mac mini with OS X 10.9.5, same Eclipse, same WOLips
>>
>> I push my local project to a private github repo and pull it from there to the customer build environment.
>>
>> When I build my ModernD2W app on my system and deploy it on the customer site everything works (build.xml run as ant task)
>> When I build the same app on the customer site and then deploy it it does not work properly. The build generates the usual split install files but the deployed app does not reference the WebServerResources properly. It is as if there was split install but no referencing embedded resources (thus paths are wrong). No difference in Monitor, just stopping the app, replacing the files, and then restarting the app inside monitor changes its behaviour.
>>
>> When I compare the two built apps (the one built on my system and the very same one built on the customer's site) there is a big difference in the startup script inside the top level .woa directory.
>>
>> The one that does not work has tons of references to environment variables like LOCAL_SHORTHAND whereas the one that does work does not have any such ref.
>>
>> I am completely at a loss. What is going on here? Why are there different startup scripts included? Why does one work, and the other one not? Where does the script come from? There must be someting going on inside WOLips during ant build, but it is the very same WOLips version.
>>
>> Any help here?
>> Thanks a lot
>> ---markus---
>>
>> <this_does_not_work.sh><this_works.sh>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden