• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?


  • Subject: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:39:26 +0000
  • Thread-topic: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?

Once an EC has objects in it, its shared EC won’t get changed if a new default
is set.  The notification is ignored.

From: "ocs@ocs" <email@hidden>
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 at 11:21 AM
To: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
Cc: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?

Chuck,


On 21 Aug 2018, at 7:50 PM, Chuck Hill
<email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>> wrote:

See er.extensions.ERXEC.useSharedEditingContext at
https://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/documentation/Explanation+of+the+default+properties+in+a+Wonder+project

Thanks a lot!

(Why on earth don't they mention this on the ERXEC documentation page? Oh,
never mind.)


Did that fix it?

Well, sort of.

It gets curiouser and curiouser — in other words, I must be doing something far
wrong.

When I set the “ERXEC.useSharedEditingContext” property to true, then

- the newly created ERXEC gets a shared editing context immediately upon
creation, not later upon receiving
DefaultSharedEditingContextWasInitializedNotification;
- and it is a different shared EC instance, not
EOSharedEditingContext.defaultSharedEditingContext()
- but it is EOSharedEditingContext.defaultSharedEditingContext() who reads in
automatically all the shared EOs
- and therefore, when fetching EOs through the ERXEC, I am still getting
non-shared ones in the ERXEC (for its own sharedEC is empty, and thus
EOSharedEditingContext.defaultSharedEditingContext is ignored).

Can you make any sense of that?

Thanks again a very big lot,
OC




On 2018-08-21, 9:43 AM, "Webobjects-dev on behalf of ocs@ocs"
<webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden<mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=email@hidden>
 on behalf of email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>> wrote:

   Hi there,

   the EOEditing context doc pretty unequivocally says

   ===
   By default, an editing context that has no shared editing context listens
for DefaultSharedEditingContextWasInitializedNotifications. If a notification
is posted while the context has no registered objects, the editing context sets
its shared editing context to the newly initialized default shared editing
context.
   ===

   Should it apply for an ERXEC, too? I sort of inferred it would, but by my
testing, it does not seem so: an ERXEC I make (through
ERXEC.newEditingContext()) seems to adamantly stay without
sharedEditingContext, although the notification is posted all right (I have
observed it myself to be sure), and if there's a good ole EOEditingContext, it
indeed duly sets its sharedEC at the time.

   Have I missed something of importance somewhere? The ERXEC documentation
does not say essentially anything of the sharedEC, far as I can say:

   http://wonder.sourceforge.net/javadoc/er/extensions/ERXEC.html

   In principle, I could work around the problem by setting the sharedEC to all
my ERXECs programmatically -- that works all right --, but it would be a lot of
work, with a danger I overlook something somewhere and got bit in the tender
parts by that...

   Thanks,
   OC

    _______________________________________________
   Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
   Webobjects-dev mailing list
(email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>)
   Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

   This email sent to email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
      • From: "ocs@ocs" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically? (From: "ocs@ocs" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically? (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically? (From: "ocs@ocs" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • Next by Date: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • Next by thread: Re: Should ERXEC get sharedEC automagically?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread