• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Complimentary App Server Choice


  • Subject: Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
  • From: Matthew Ness via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:08:04 +1100

I wouldn't hesitate to recommend Bootique.

We've had various types of Bootique apps in production for years now to great
success, some with the Cayenne module directly derived from older WO apps/dbs,
some communicating with existing WO apps, others simply processing tasks.


Regards,

--
Matt
http://logicsquad.net
https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/


On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, Andrus Adamchik via Webobjects-dev wrote:
> My opinionated take is the following:
>
> * The "official" JavaEE is dead and is now a pure volunteer effort under
> https://jakarta.ee/ . The "appserver" concept has almost disappeared and
> morphed to something different. All the past market leaders have moved on to
> more lightweight solutions, though some still cling to .war deployment.
>
> * SpringBoot is the market leader in the Java world. If you are looking to
> build a marketable Java developer resume, learn SpringBoot.
>
> * If you need to write apps for your org or your customers, and are not
> constrained by the PHBs opinion, use Bootique. It is a better platform in the
> modern appserver-free world. Bootique is "commercially-viable" in a sense
> that there are hundreds of apps that run in prod for a number of years. But
> it is still an open source effort supported by community and a mid-sized
> company (ObjectStyle), so it is sometimes an uphill battle in organizations
> that are looking to conform to the lowest common denominator.
>
> So you decide :)
>
> Andrus
>
>
>> On Feb 13, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev
>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for that… it looks really interesting…
>>
>> Is it a commercially viable alternative to some of the others like JBoss,
>> Tomcat, Websphere etc..
>>
>> I would like to add another feather to my bow but not really sure which
>> architecture to devote time to so that I can work on bigger projects in a
>> team...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 11:16, Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> We are using Bootique: https://bootique.io/
>>>
>>> Just like SpringBoot, its idea is that it is not an "appserver". It gives
>>> you a plain Java app with your own "main" method, and a way to assemble
>>> various components together (and also modularity, dependency injection,
>>> consistent configuration and a large collection of ready-to-use modules).
>>> The app can serve web requests, run jobs or do whatever.
>>>
>>> Unlike SpringBoot, Bootique is much smaller, starts much faster, and
>>> doesn't feel like magic. Also all the apps you write are automatically
>>> equipped with POSIX CLI.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Paul Yu via Webobjects-dev
>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Spring and it’s ecosystem seems to be pretty powerful.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> Please excuse iOS autocomplete
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 11, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev
>>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  hey if any one was to use a different app server configuration other
>>>>> than WO what would you choose and why?
>>>>>
>>>>> What are most companies requesting these days in a Java system?
>>>
>>
>>

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
      • From: Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
    • Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
      • From: Tony Giaccone via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Complimentary App Server Choice (From: Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Complimentary App Server Choice (From: Paul Yu via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Complimentary App Server Choice (From: Andrus Adamchik via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Complimentary App Server Choice (From: Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Complimentary App Server Choice (From: Andrus Adamchik via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Back again....
  • Next by Date: Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
  • Previous by thread: Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
  • Next by thread: Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread