Re: xemacs update
Re: xemacs update
- Subject: Re: xemacs update
- From: Martin Costabel <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:20:20 +0200
robert delius royar wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 about 08:11 +0200 UTC Martin Costabel wrote:
Compiling anything, fink or not, while /usr/local/lib/libgcc.dylib is
around appears to be a bad idea. This has nothing to do with fink. I
think any program that installs libgcc.dylib is broken and should be
outlawed.
On my system Apple's own gcc3.3 (Jan 2003 build) installed the library in
/usr/local/lib. I don't believe it will complie without the library.
This may be as it is, but then it is a different situation. It would
certainly simplify some compilations if a dynamic libgcc (and likewise a
dynamic libstdc++) were present. With the default gcc-3.1 from OSX 10.2,
however, there is no libgcc.dylib. In the cases I have seen, this
libgcc.dylib was not even compatible with OSX 10.2, it typically led to
> ld: Undefined symbols:
> ___eprintf
The reason is that the default linker command line has a -lgcc flag
which normally resolves to /usr/lib/libgcc.a, but not when
/usr/local/lib/libgcc.dylib is present. In that case, it takes the
latter, and undefined symbols may result.
--
Martin
_______________________________________________
x11-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/x11-users
X11 for Mac OS X FAQ: http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1232.html
Report issues, request features, feedback: http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.