• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Software Update for X11
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Software Update for X11


  • Subject: Re: Software Update for X11
  • From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:02:59 +0100


On 02 Nov 2006, at 22:48, Rich Cook wrote:

Spotlight should allow arbitrary actions based on arbitrary filters, and then 3rd parties will come up with great ways to use them.

I think that's what Automator is for.

Not quite! I don't see a list of arbitrary actions,

If you want completely arbitrary actions, you need a general purpose programming language. Xcode contains templates for Applescript, Cocoa and shell script Automator actions. Or do you propose the introduction of yet another programming language specific to Automator?


I see a list of actions that a few applications can perform, that have typed inputs and outputs, further restricting their domain.

Well, some people like dynamically typed or untyped languages, others like statically typed languages (with inheritance available). I am in the second category.


How many users use Automator to automate their workflows?

I have no idea.

It would be more useful to allow a raw data stream or file as input to an action, with the output being a raw data stream or file. The actions themselves would just be arbitrary processes.

The latter is already possible.

Hey, sounds like a shell script, but one that GUI developers could provide quick and easy support for more often than not.

I really don't see how most GUI apps could handle random streams of binary data. Every bit of data passed around via the clipboard has a type associated with it, because if it were just random data e.g. Keynote wouldn't know whether it were an image or a bunch of junk text you want to paste. Maybe what you want are explicit type casts?


Whatever, my point was more that Apple should spend a bit more time crafting what they already made and somewhat less on the Next Great Thing. Just my opinion. :-)

I do agree with this point.


Jonas _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list (email@hidden) This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Software Update for X11
      • From: Rich Cook <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Software Update for X11 (From: Ernest Prabhakar <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Software Update for X11 (From: Craig Loomis <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Software Update for X11 (From: Rich Cook <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Software Update for X11 (From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Software Update for X11 (From: Rich Cook <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Segmentation fault on X11 apps under 10.4.8 (Intel)
  • Next by Date: Re: X11 Update Fonts Crash OpenOffice.org
  • Previous by thread: Re: Software Update for X11
  • Next by thread: Re: Software Update for X11
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread