• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3


  • Subject: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
  • From: Alexey Proskuryakov <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:06:48 +0300

On 06.01.2004 16:54, "Glen Low" <email@hidden> wrote:

> You might be able to fix it by putting a symlink in that spot back to
> the actual library.

  Actually, it's enough to add all dependent 3rd party frameworks to the
project - it's only searching that's affected (and the wrong path in the
last warning is purely cosmetic).

> The long term solution, a feature request, is that Xcode have a
> "relative to SDK" option in addition to "absolute", "relative to
> project" etc. instead of blindly tagging SDKROOT to everything, and
> that added libraries and frameworks start out with this.

  I am not sure that it's really needed. The algorithm described by Chris
Espinosa seems fine to me, the only problem being that Xcode doesn't seem to
implement it precisely enough :)

- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Glen Low <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
  • Next by Date: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
  • Previous by thread: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
  • Next by thread: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread