Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
- Subject: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
- From: Paul Lalonde <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:29:25 -0500
Le 04-01-06, ` 08:59, Glen Low a icrit :
If you look inside the /Developer/SDK/ folders, it actually mirrors
the entire usr/include tree, including the gcc C and C++ headers and
libraries. Hopefully that should mean it will pick all of these up
from the SDK and not the root.
My original post stated I was interested in the Chris Espinosa's "Just
target, no SDK" scenario, i.e. building on Panther with the normal
headers & libs (no explicitly set SDK), and setting the deployment
target to 10.2. Why do I want this? To be able to use Panther-only
features when my app runs on Panther.
The post did mention my "SDK is that of 10.3"; that probably gave the
wrong impression. I'm not using the SDK feature at all.
Besides IIRC C++ on a Mac doesn't use dylibs, it's 99% headers and 1%
libstdc++.a which is a statically linked file anyway, so even if you
link against the 10.3 headers and static lib, it should function fine
on an older machine. (No, I haven't actually tested this.)
Well, that's what I'd like to know :) There have been important
changes to the C++ library in Panther -- proper support for wchar_t has
all of a sudden made a bunch of classes available (wstring etc). It's
easy to imagine that merely including a header could lead to some
unwanted dependency on new features of the library. So it would be
nice to get some official word on if & how this is supported.
What ever happened to backward binary compatibility -- I thought the
whole idea of different Versions of the same framework was to get away
from this SDK thing?
--
Paul Lalonde paullalonde at mac dot com
"Il n'y a que les banques qui sont libres" -- Jean-Luc Godard
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: "James J. Merkel" <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Erez Anzel <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Glen Low <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Paul Lalonde <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Glen Low <email@hidden>) |