Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
- Subject: Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3
- From: Paul Lalonde <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:43:48 -0500
Le 04-01-05, ` 19:04, Chris Espinosa a icrit :
As I've said before, you can do these independently or together:
Neither SDK nor Development Target: build for current OS only (of
course, most code will run on future OS versions too)
Just SDK and not Target: forward-develop for future OS
Just target, no SDK: build for current OS but weak-link if running on
older OS
Both SDK and target: build for older OS without using newer OS
features. (This is useful, e.g. in building KEXTs for 10.1, say)
Is this information valid for C++ applications also? I am building an
app on 10.3, and want it to run on 10.2 and later (case #3 above). It
uses the C++ library extensively (STL, std::string, iostreams, etc).
Somehow I doubt that just changing the deployment target will make my
project compile & link against the correct version of the C++ headers &
libraries. That would imply (since the SDK is that of 10.3) that they
are binary-compatible between these two OS revs.
Of course I'd love to be proven wrong :)
--
Paul Lalonde paullalonde at mac dot com
"Il n'y a que les banques qui sont libres" -- Jean-Luc Godard
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: "James J. Merkel" <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Erez Anzel <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Glen Low <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Building For OS 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>) |