Re: G4 and G5 executable
Re: G4 and G5 executable
- Subject: Re: G4 and G5 executable
- From: Dave Rehring <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:52:36 -0700
On 4/4/05 8:44 AM, Shawn Erickson at email@hidden wrote:
> "Fat Binaries - The updated Mach-O format in Tiger supports the concept
> of Fat Binaries. These allow both 32-bit and 64-bit executables to be
> shipped as part of the same file. This means that developers and
> network system administrators can distribute a single version of an
> application to all users regardless of whether their system contains a
> G3, G4, or G5 processor. When the application is executed, the system
> automatically selects the appropriate code for the system without user
> intervention. Using Fat Binaries greatly simplifies distribution,
> installation, and administration of applications."
Gah. The mach-o format supported fat binaries 15 years ago, when you could
have native binaries for 68K and Intel boxes in the same binaries.
Later,
--
David Rehring Psychos do not explode when light hits
VP of Research and Development them, no matter how crazy they are...
Atimi Software, Inc.
www.atimi.com And totally insane guy!
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden