Re: G4 and G5 executable
Re: G4 and G5 executable
- Subject: Re: G4 and G5 executable
- From: George Warner <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:34:23 -0700
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:52:36 -0700, Dave Rehring <email@hidden> wrote:
> Gah. The mach-o format supported fat binaries 15 years ago, when you could
> have native binaries for 68K and Intel boxes in the same binaries.
This is true for the arch but not for the sub-arch (different variants of
the same processor architecture). We didn't add the arch sub-type smarts to
the fat dylb loader until Panther.
--
Enjoy,
George Warner,
Schizophrenic Optimization Scientist
Apple Developer Technical Support (DTS)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden