Re: bloated binaries?
Re: bloated binaries?
- Subject: Re: bloated binaries?
- From: james tittle <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:34:39 -0400
On Aug 16, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Aug 16, 2005, at 12:49 , james tittle wrote:
...ok, running nm shows me that I've got a lot more symbols in the
small, old version than the bloated new version: I would've
expected it to be the other way?
...Still open to any application diets :-)
Try "size -arch all blah" (or whatever your executable is called)
on both versions.
...ok, here's the results:
xcode 1.5/gcc3.3, smaller app:
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
2600960 6713344 4096 692224 10010624 98c000
tigital$ ls -la
total 6600
drwxr-xr-x 3 tigital tigital 102 May 14 2004 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 tigital tigital 238 May 14 2004 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 tigital tigital 3377476 Jan 1 1970 Freespace2demo
xcode2.2/gcc3.3, "bloated" app:
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
2084864 6320128 4096 16856 8425944 8091d8
tigital$ ls -la
total 13992
drwxr-xr-x 3 tigital tigital 102 Aug 14 22:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 tigital tigital 204 Aug 14 21:48 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 tigital tigital 7160280 Aug 14 22:06 Freespace2demo
...this seems strange, in that the mach-o stuff seems kinda the same
except for "others", but outside of "man size", I don't know what
this may or may not be telling me...
jamie
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden