• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing


  • Subject: Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
  • From: Mark Dawson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:16:44 -0800

I believe that the Mac Mini has a 4200 rpm drive so the I/O performance is not going to compete with the faster disks you find in the G5 PowerMac or the xServe. However, as you point out the price for a Mac mini is much lower, so using more Mac Minis may compensate (don't know since I've never tried).

That's quite slow by current standards (I guess there's quite a price saving). My PowerBook G4 has the 5400 RPM drive, but that's still a bit faster. During a distributed build is the local drive used for retrieving framework headers etc. ? Or does the data coming across the net include a fully precompiled set of headers with everything in it? Avoiding swapping would be the other key thing - the minis are really no bargain at all with the Factory installed 1Gig Ram (add nearly $500 !), perhaps the more modest 512MB for an additional 75 bucks would be better value.
An Apple refurbished dual 2.5GB machine (512 MB/160 GB SATA) drive is about 4x the cost of a 512 MB 1.42GHz (new) Mac Mini ($2599 vs $649). It would be interesting to see which (1 dual 2.5 G5 or 4 1.42Mhz Mac Minis) would win in a distributed shoot out. Especially if you're starting out (you local machine) with a dual 2.5 G5. Would the faster CPU, system (memory, system bus, etc), Ethernet (1 GBit vs 100 MBit), and drive speeds (7200 SATA vs 4200 ATA) win out over the sheer numbers of the Mac minis?

It's too bad that RAM disks are not supported on OS X--adding 1 GB of memory to a G5 is less than $150. If I/O disk speed is important, having 1 GB of memory, instead of a drive, should be a lot faster (back in the olden days of OS 7, I remember adding a RAM disk could speed up MPW C++ compiles by 2x, and even with OS 9/G4s, by up to 40%).

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
      • From: James Bucanek <email@hidden>
    • Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
      • From: Mark Dawson <email@hidden>
    • Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
      • From: Mark Dalrymple <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing (From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing (From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing (From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: XCode, Java, and Eclipse
  • Next by Date: Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
  • Previous by thread: Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
  • Next by thread: Re: Distributed build overhead and Mac Mini vs XServe pricing
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread