• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel


  • Subject: Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel
  • From: Ian Krieg <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:29:20 -0700

Recommending that users perform the update to 10.3.9 is one thing, making it possible for them is another. There are still many people that either do not have a modem or are on dial-up. It is my experience that these people typically do not do the software updates unless they can be purchased on disk (for a nominal fee).

It is my experience that these same people are not typically updating their application software. Ergo their status quo is maintained.

I doubt that the correlation is all that strong. I don't have any research to back me up, but I doubt anyone here does; if they do, let's hear it. Meanwhile, I'm guessing that if you're well-off, you'll get a speedy Internet connection and upgrade software products when you want to. If you have just enough money for the project and you're obsessed with keeping your computer up-to-date, you will get a speedy Internet connection and buy all the software updates for the products you use. However, for those who can afford a computer and can afford to buy programs for it, but who cannot afford to buy everything that they would enjoy, a little more prioritizing is needed. Software that they use regularly they will probably consider upgrading, especially if the new features or bugfixes are attractive. A fast Internet connection they will probably only consider if they tend to perform high-bandwidth activities of some importance; to a person who just checks a few web sites and keeps up with email, buying broadband might seem a little over-the-top.


These are only my guesses, they may be quite wrong, but if they aren't, then you can see that there can be plenty of reason for a person to buy software upgrades without buying broadband. If your product is important to them, and your upgrade is worth it's price not only in the work and thought you put into it, but as relates to a particular customer's needs, then you should be able to make the sale regardless of what kind of Internet connection a customer has. That's a little over-simplified, and I'm certainly not saying that if you don't make the sale you're clearly doing something wrong. A broadband connection probably indicates that the customer has more spare cash, but even those with dial-up still have buying power.

I suspect that most of us software developers are fairly well-off; nothing like millionaires, but paying for broadband and the software we want is just not a big deal. The idea of somebody doing without broadband seems foreign to us, like the idea of doing without coffee to a Seattle native. However, there are many people who have good reasons for doing both. Apple seems to take this Silicon Valley in the case of Software Update. One might think otherwise on first glance, because for those who are only connected to the Internet occasionally, Software Update offers the option to download now and install later. However, the feature doesn't actually work. The program complains of having no Internet connection when asked to install an update that has already been downloaded. I think there's some room for improvement here.

Ian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel (From: "Kirk A. Baker" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel (From: David Niemeijer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel (From: Creed Erickson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel
  • Next by Date: Re: Feature Proposition
  • Previous by thread: Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel
  • Next by thread: Re: Universal Binary that runs on 10.3.x and up on PPC and 10.4.1 and up on Intel
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread