Re: ZeroLink: Perhaps better disabled per default?
Re: ZeroLink: Perhaps better disabled per default?
- Subject: Re: ZeroLink: Perhaps better disabled per default?
- From: Marshall Clow <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:53:15 -0700
At 2:41 AM +0200 10/14/05, Andreas Grosam wrote:
While I fully agree with j o a r, I would like to mention, that
this code snippet will compile without errors:
// file: foo.c
extern void bar(); // prototype
void foo() {
boar(); // typo
}
Don't expect errors when compiling with a C compiler. It even will
not complain when the -pedantic or -Wmissing-prototypes flags are on.
This is because it is completely valid and legal code.
Sure, it won't link.
This may be true with gcc, but I have used C compilers (since the
early 1990s) that would complain if they saw a routine that they had
not previously seen a declaration or prototype for. (This behavior
was controlled by a compiler switch, usually called "Require function
prototypes" or something similar.)
This was not a CodeWarrior-ism, it predates CodeWarrior.
--
-- Marshall
Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:email@hidden>
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden