Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?

Subject: Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?
From: "Peter.Teeson" <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:57:55 -0400

Is the one XCode uses more conforming to the standard than the Rogue Wave one?

I note that Rogue donated theirs to Apache and it's now in incubation.
That source code is available at <http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/>

As an aside why isn't the XCode libstdc++ source distributed with developer tools?

respect....

Peter

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?
From: Andreas Grosam <email@hidden>


Prev by Date:
Re: newbie questions regarding interface builder

Next by Date:
Re: Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?

Previous by thread:
Re: Don't invoke this method when build configurations are enabled

Next by thread:
Re: Standard C++ lib -- which is more conforming to the standard?

Index(es):

Date
Thread