Re: Codewarrior vs XCode
Re: Codewarrior vs XCode
- Subject: Re: Codewarrior vs XCode
- From: Marc Manthey <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:09:40 +0200
hello all,
its great to read all the comments , for me as a newbie it was kinda
hard to understand where the world is going :-)
since i was at the end of my search to find an non_existing code , i
was a bit frustrated and did not know what todo.
I could not afford CW to get hands on some old sources that i found.
I was not into developing before just
had a lot of experience with stream and cuseeme from the early days.
For me its not easy to understand why old things sometimes stop working.
After a while i found a java reflector that works on my osx system ,
but since i noticed how slow java is
in relation to lets say a "real " programms and i heard that it will
not work on rosetta anyway , i thought of
how can i turn a java programm into a real programm and how is a way
to work with sorces from CW 6 ?
Sorry for my stupid questions , but since i found out that there is
no interest in
www.cuseeme.de i thought of changing it :-)
http://userpage.chemie.fu-berlin.de/~sunny/iNetMM/MultimediaImNetz.
5.html#pgfId=852769
On Sep 17, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Daniel Jalkut wrote:
The biggest question for you to answer is whether your competitors,
existing or potential, will decide to embrace Xcode now, instead of
waiting 6 months or a year to do so. If the Mac market share you
possess now is important to you, then I think it would be foolish
not to at least begin the port now. You don't need a transition
machine to get the code collected and compiling without warning for
i386, which will probably be the bulk of the work involved for most
developers.
On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:51 PM, Turtle Creek Software wrote:
. Maybe CodeWarrior died because Motorola didn't care, but it
seems likelier that competing
against free software (i.e. XCode) was the primary cause of death.
That's got to stir up some anger for CW folks who suddenly have no
choice but to switch to the culprit.
For us, because our Mac volume is so low relative to Windows,
we'll probably just wait for a real Macintel machine instead of
blowing
$1000 for a temporary test unit-- so we probably won't even start on
the XCode port til spring. How many other developers are planning to
do the same?
It's not fun to be forced into a program which doesn't work right, and
it doesn't sound like XCode will be a suitable replacement for CW
within the next 6 months.
have a great day
--
P.S. friendly developer with lots of time for a little help wanted ;)
Les Enfants Terribles
www.let.de
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden