Re: cvs 1.10 vs 1.11
Re: cvs 1.10 vs 1.11
- Subject: Re: cvs 1.10 vs 1.11
- From: j o a r <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:21:31 +0100
On Dec 28, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Jeff Ray wrote:
Since I will eventually have a nib, XCode's docs recommend I use
ocvs (1.10) and set up wrappers.
That's what they recommend? Sounds weird, since most CVS users today
(including Apple) are moving to Subversion that doesn't support tar-
wrapped files anyway.
1) What kind of problems will I create if I attempt to use both
cvs 1.10 (ocvs) and 1.11 with the same repository?
You would create bad problems!
2) If I instead wanted to use 1.11 with XCode, what issues am I
looking at? Is it simply a matter of checking in the bundle's
parts as individual files and directories, or is there more to a
bundle than that (ie, strange finder flags)?
No, that's it. Xcode is (IMO) lacking a bit when it comes to
providing a good UI / interaction for dealing with bundled files in
SCM, but for the most part it works just as well as for files that
are not bundles.
j o a r
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden