• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC


  • Subject: Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
  • From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:21:48 -0800

On Feb 19, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Brad Oliver wrote:

And as I mentioned, on MacBook Pro systems Xcode 2.2.1 is slightly

faster than CodeWarrior Development Studio 10 in a full build of a

large C++ application.


I have heard it said that CW 10 is roughly twice as slow as CW 9.x, so this may not be the best comparison.


That's certainly not our experience.  In our tests the Xcode build finished pretty much right between a CW9 build (slightly faster) and a CW10 build (slightly slower).  The delta between CW9 and CW10 was less that 5%.

Chris
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
      • From: tyler <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: newbie q: Static library in /usr/lib not being seen?
  • Next by Date: Re: Adress of function
  • Previous by thread: Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
  • Next by thread: Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread