• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC


  • Subject: Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
  • From: tyler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:31:59 -0800

Just for some more real-world in-the-field comparisons:


Command line Ant driven xcode 2.2 build of a multi-project medium- sized code base (for commercially shipping application) building x86 & ppc versions of all the code and creating universal binaries. Code is mostly C++, Objective C, and some C & ObjC++. gcc 4.0 in all cases. Full clean and rebuild. Does do a check for new source via perforce, but full sync was done first so no actual source had to be acquired (adds a fixed few of second overhead - more for the quad since it's at home and doing sync over the vpn, but still, just a few seconds). So, accuracy is not high here but general order of magnitudes are probably valid with the quad at the biggest disadvantage due to VPN:


- G5 (early dual 2GHz G5, 1.5G RAM) (not dist build) - 22 minutes 11 seconds
(this machine has seemed slow the last few months and probably has a hard drive that is overly full or fragmented)


- xserve (dual 2GHz G5, 2G RAM) (not dist build) - 18 min 20 seconds

- iMac dual-core Intel based (512Meg RAM) (not dist build) - 18 minutes 14 seconds

- G5 (early dual 2GHz G5, 1.5G RAM) (With distributed builds to 7 dual 2GHz G5s via switched 100baseT) - 11 min 41 sec
(this machine has seemed slow the last few months and probably has a hard drive that is overly full or fragmented)


- Quad G5 (2.5GHz, 2G RAM) (not dist build) - 9 min 56 sec


Numbers validate my general feeling - I LOVE MY QUAD G5 ! ! ! :-)

tyler

P.S. Clearly the imac needs more ram, but looking at the paging in/ out counts there are very few page outs so it doesn't really seem RAM bound to me in this case.

On Feb 17, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Steve Mills wrote:
The test I did was 18 minutes with an Intel iMac, and 23 minutes building on a dual 2.3GHz G5 distributing to dual 2GHz G5 and dual 800M G4 (file distribution was over AirPort Extreme, so it was probably a bit slower than if I were using Ethernet). I haven't timed a CW 9.6 build in a while, but I think it's right between those 2 times, probably closer to 18.



_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: debugging a server app
  • Next by Date: Re: debugging on Intel macs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Xcode running on Intel vs PPC
  • Next by thread: XCode Ref Library cannot go to html anchor tags
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread