• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: -O3 vs. -Os
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: -O3 vs. -Os


  • Subject: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:41:20 -0800


On Jan 16, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Rustam Muginov wrote:

I believe that -O3 is only useful in the heavily computational tasks.
"Regular" apps would benefit from -Os optimizaiton, and only manualy-tuned high-performance libraries would work faster with -O3

Two questions. First, how would you define "Regular"?

Second, on what do you base that assertion? The idea that smaller code is faster makes perfect sense when you think about it from a cache point of view. Turning off optimizations and making the code larger at the same time doesn't seem likely to improve performance.

- Steve

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: -O3 vs. -Os
      • From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>
References: 
 >-O3 vs. -Os (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Next by Date: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Previous by thread: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Next by thread: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread