• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XCode on Intel/Mac


  • Subject: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • From: David Reed <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:14:05 -0500


On Jan 20, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Chris Espinosa wrote:

On Jan 20, 2006, at 7:21 AM, Matt Gough wrote:


On 19 Jan 2006, at 01:04, Chris Espinosa wrote:

How is the compile speed on the new machines?

On an iMac Core Duo, a tick or two slower than a Quad G5.


Are you saying that the overall compile speed of an entire project is about the same with all cores being used at once, or that the time for a single file compile is about the same?

In our tests, a large C++ project finishes a full clean build slightly (a matter of seconds) sooner on a Quad Tower than it does on a Core Duo iMac. So the 2-core Intel is only slightly slower than the 4-core Quad for full builds.


Warning: every project is different, and the dynamics of disk and cache speed and latency, processor saturation, process threading, and system memory will affect your results significantly. But we are very pleased with the IDE and compiler performance on the Intel chip.

Chris


Just curious - what is the cause of this (or what do you think it is)? All of the following statements are based on memory so they may be incorrect, but if they are correct, the performance makes sense to me. I believe that Intel chips are generally better than PowerPC for integer instructions (although the G5 is much better for floating point instructions) and compiling is just about all integer instructions if not 100% integer instructions. Isn't the memory in the new Intel iMac faster than the memory in the new PowerMac? Better integer performance and faster memory (which is often the bottleneck) means that even with twice as many processors it's just slightly better.

Someone please correct me if my memory isn't correct.

Dave


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
      • From: Rosyna <email@hidden>
    • Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
      • From: email@hidden
References: 
 >XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Ken Baer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Matt Gough <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: What changes to the project does it want to save?
  • Next by Date: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • Previous by thread: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • Next by thread: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread