• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Optimization questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Optimization questions


  • Subject: Re: Optimization questions
  • From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:09:02 -0800

On Nov 22, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Blair M. Burtan wrote:

If you don't care about code size (because you have tons of RAM anyway) is
it better to use Fastest or Fastest, Smallest? Which produces faster code?

I'll second what Mark said -- profile your code and go with what's best. In general we've found that smaller code is faster, but when you're very concerned with performance across the entire application it's always best to run tests and measure things carefully.


Also, should you be using instruction scheduling for a Universal Binary even
though there aren't any choices that pertain to Intel processors?

The default scheduling we use when compiling for Intel is optimal for both Core and Core 2 systems, so you don't have to change anything here.


Hope this helps,
Eric

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Optimization questions
      • From: Niels Meersschaert <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Optimization questions (From: "Blair M. Burtan" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Can't get Global Variables to work
  • Next by Date: problems in setting LIBRARY_SEARCH_PATHS
  • Previous by thread: Re: Optimization questions
  • Next by thread: Re: Optimization questions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread