Re: GCC, DLLs are accumulated ?
Re: GCC, DLLs are accumulated ?
- Subject: Re: GCC, DLLs are accumulated ?
- From: Ruslan Zasukhin <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:45:01 +0300
- Thread-topic: GCC, DLLs are accumulated ?
On 9/21/06 6:56 PM, "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> ** We have project A which produce A.DLL that depends on
>> few dlls 1.dll and 2.dll
>>
>>
>> ** Also we have project that produce B.dll and it should depend on
>> A.dll.
>> It is strange that xcode/gcc want to see in this project also 1.dll
>> and
>> 2.dll
>>
>> in MS or CodeWarrior it was enough include into project B
>> single A.dll
>>
>>
>> ** If next I have project C that produce C.dll which depend on B.dll
>> I again need include here all above dlls. Nightmare.
>>
>>
>> -----------
>> So why GCC works in this way? This break e.g. Encapsulation idea.
>>
>> May be exists way to force work it in normal/smart way ?
>
> Kinda of confused... are you really producing dynamically linked
> libraries that end in DLL for Mac OS X? That may be your problem... I
> am not sure if dyld knows how to look those up (it works with .dylib).
Of course we made .dylib - MACHO Dynamic libs
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden