Re: why aren't xibs the default?
Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- Subject: Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- From: Jon Hess <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:30:06 -0800
Hey Matt -
On Dec 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Matt Neuburg <email@hidden> wrote:
Possibly I'm being really dense here, with the result that the
hypotheses of
these questions could be false, so feel free to set me straight. My
questions are:
(1) If .xibs are good, why aren't they the default for new projects?
They aren't the default because many people depend on building on a
Tiger based machine.
(2) Why is it so hard, when you tell IB that you want it to save
as .xib, to
get the .xib to be seen by the Xcode project?
This has already been fixed for the next release of IB.
Good Luck -
Jon Hess
m.
--
matt neuburg, phd = email@hidden, <http://www.tidbits.com/matt/>
A fool + a tool + an autorelease pool = cool!
One of the 2007 MacTech Top 25: <http://tinyurl.com/2rh4pf>
AppleScript: the Definitive Guide - Second Edition!
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596102119>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden