RE: distcc incompatible between different OS builds
RE: distcc incompatible between different OS builds
- Subject: RE: distcc incompatible between different OS builds
- From: "Jeremy Todd" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:25:08 -0400
> But now that 10.4.10 is out (and a palindrome!), you can upgrade all
> your machines to it, and thus have all of them using the same
> version
> of the OS again.
I was hoping 10.4.10 would help, but now I see 10.4.10 (8R2218, i386) and
10.4.10 (8R2232, i386) after upgrading two of our machines. Any idea if I
can resolve this version mismatch?
Jeremy
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:54:09 -0700
> From: Andrew Pontious <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: distcc incompatible between different OS builds
> To: email@hidden
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Jeremy Todd wrote:
>
> > We just bought a new MacBook and it seems to be running OS
> X 10.4.9
> > 8P4112.
> > The rest of the Intel-based Macs in our office are running 10.4.9
> > 8P2137.
> > Unfortunately distcc isn't allowing shared builds to take place
> > between
> > these OS versions, so the new MacBook is all by itself on
> the shared
> > build
> > network :).
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's possible to update the rest of our
> > computers to use
> > 8P4112?
>
> Any newly-released machine is going to have a newer, custom
> version of
> the last-released OS, in order to have the support for the hardware
> that wasn't in that last release. That's what 8P4112 is. So no, you
> can't upgrade all your machines to that version.
>
> But now that 10.4.10 is out (and a palindrome!), you can upgrade all
> your machines to it, and thus have all of them using the same
> version
> of the OS again.
>
> > Better yet, is it possible to make distcc less restrictive regarding
> > what it views as a compatible computer suitable for sharing
> builds?
> > We also
> > have many PowerPCs on the network but they're now useless to our
> > Intel-based
> > Macs.
>
> Please read the Xcode 2 User Guide: Distributing Builds Among
> Multiple
> Computers to see what your options are.
>
> While "shared workgroup" builds (which use distcc) require the same
> architecture for all machines, "dedicated network" builds do not,
> although both options require you to be using the same
> version of the
> OS. There are other pros and cons to each approach. Please read the
> documentation, and do a search on this mail list, for more details.
>
> -- Andrew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden