• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open?


  • Subject: Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open?
  • From: Ronald Hayden <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:04:59 -0700

Unfortunately, for reasons unrelated to the release, updated developer documentation won't be available until later next week. We wish this weren't the case, but it was unavoidable given some internal infrastructure juggling.

 -- Ron


On Oct 26, 2007, at 5:10 AM, Kyle Sluder <email@hidden> wrote:

Does anyone know when the official documentation is going to hit ADC
Online?  If it's going to be ~6PM PDT, then that would make a
convenient watershed.

--Kyle Sluder

On 10/26/07, Alastair Houghton <email@hidden> wrote:
On 26 Oct 2007, at 12:56, Alexander von Below wrote:

Am 26.10.2007 um 13:00 schrieb Nils Holland:

So, this probably applies to this list here as well: The NDA
officially stays in effect until today, 6 pm Pacific time.

OK. Let us read the verbatim of the NDA then:

Section 6, Confidential Information.

"Confidential Information, however, does not  include: (a)
information that Apple makes generally available to the public;"
http://developer.apple.com/membership/pdf/terms.pdf

IANAL, but I believe, shipping it to customers counts. Therefore, I
see no reason not to talk about it.

Well, IANAL either, but there is the issue of legal jurisdictions. Does "the public" mean "the public in whatever legal jurisdiction presides over this contract"? I suspect that it probably does. Or at least, I'm certain that most courts would view it that way, if only out of a sense of local self-importance. (i.e. in the U.K., "the public" in a contract *probably* means "the British public"; likewise in other countries)

Anyway, the general point is that the NDA cannot any longer be an
effective restriction, since consumers (or those with retail Leopard
DVDs) can talk about it, and they could tell us something, and that
information could then be passed on outside the NDA.

*But* since some of us still don't have copies, and since we can't
simply forward all questions in an easterly direction until we hit
someone who does have, the post from Scott Anguish on cocoa-dev does
make a certain amount of sense.

*I* don't particularly want to see tonnes of messages along the lines
of "Alastair, please can you answer this because I'm still under the
NDA?" (replace my name with anyone eastwards of your location).  And
Apple probably doesn't want its launch events ruined by developers
turning up with developer seeds going "Hey, look at this, it's great"
a few hours before the actual event.

It'll be better and simpler if people wait.

(You might say it would be better if Apple had officially lifted the
NDA on Leopard-related matters, but I imagine they didn't do that to
avoid confusion over what was still covered by NDA and what wasn't.)

Kind regards,

Alastair.

--
http://alastairs-place.net


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open? (From: Alexander von Below <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open? (From: Nils Holland <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open? (From: Alexander von Below <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open? (From: Alastair Houghton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open? (From: "Kyle Sluder" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Dimbulb Xcode include path question
  • Next by Date: Re: Variable array size declaration and the debugger
  • Previous by thread: Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open?
  • Next by thread: Re: Can I declare the Xcode 3 discussion open?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread