Re: libPng is not univeral?
Re: libPng is not univeral?
- Subject: Re: libPng is not univeral?
- From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:01:04 -0700
On Oct 29, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
The /usr/local/lib in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk on my leopard
system is empty. Do you have a libPng.dylib in yours?
For me, usr/local/lib in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk is a symbolic
link to /usr/local/lib, which has a lot of stuff, but now I'm
remembering that I had issues a while back, and that I *might* have
done some linking out of the SDK folder.
Thing is, libPng in this case is used by Nano, a Carbon C++
development framework, and Nano does not go installing stuff anywhere
besides its own directory. So, Nano is relying on something in the
system default libraries.
It's puzzling, for sure, because I think Mac OS X ships with nothing
in /usr/local, right?
Related: if I target the 10.5 SDK, but don't actually use
functionality only in 10.5, will my binary run on 10.4?
--
Rick
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden