• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?


  • Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • From: Rich Siegel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:10:32 -0400

On 8/8/08 at 10:04 AM, email@hidden (Bill Cheeseman) wrote:

I've been using GCC 4.2 on a PPC machine for some time now, and I used
LLVM-GCC 4.2 on it for a while, as well. I can find nothing in the Xcode 3.1
Release Notes that suggests 4.2 can't be used to build universal
applications.

I sit corrected :-), sorry about the mixup. The documentation doesn't specifically exclude PowerPC; I'm not sure how I came up with that.


R.
--
Rich Siegel                                 Bare Bones Software, Inc.
<email@hidden>                      <http://www.barebones.com/>

Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: pragma to ensure link order
  • Next by Date: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Previous by thread: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Next by thread: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread