• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?


  • Subject: Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
  • From: "Mattias Arrelid" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:01:25 +0100

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 16:05, Jim Correia <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Robert Monaghan wrote:
>
>> How about with Tiger users? Do the applications work there, too?
>
> I'm not sure how this got moved to Cocoa-Dev. Moving it back to the original
> list.
>
> The release notes say:
>
>        Note that neither gcc-4.2 nor llvm-gcc-4.2 will compile code against
> the
>        10.4u or earlier SDK, or deploy for Mac OS X 10.4 or earlier.

We compile with 4.2, with end users running our product under
10.4/10.5. Note that it isn't a supported configuration though... all
our customers that used to be able to run our application on G3
processors are now left out in the dark.

/ M
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
      • From: Jeremy Pereira <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code? (From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code? (From: Luca Ciciriello <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code? (From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Messages without a matching method signature will be assumed to return 'id' and accept '...' as arguments.
  • Next by Date: Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
  • Next by thread: Re: Any reason to avoid GCC-4.2 for Leopard and later targeted code?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread