Re: -Wall
Re: -Wall
- Subject: Re: -Wall
- From: "Mark Wagner" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:40:33 -0700
On 6/4/08, Stuart Malin <email@hidden> wrote:
> Is there some other way I can inform the
> compiler (and a future maintainer) that the parameter is intentionally not
> used?
Our code has the following macro, designed to defeat even the smartest
optimizing compiler:
#define USE(x) {Int _y_ = ((Int)(long)&_y_, x, 1);}
It also has simpler versions of the macro for compilers that don't
need the complexity.
--
Mark
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >-Wall (From: Stuart Malin <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: -Wall (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: -Wall (From: Stuart Malin <email@hidden>) |