Re: -Wall
Re: -Wall
- Subject: Re: -Wall
- From: "Patrick Stinson" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:47:05 -0800
woah. and that works for all compilers?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Mark Wagner <email@hidden> wrote:
> On 6/4/08, Stuart Malin <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Is there some other way I can inform the
>> compiler (and a future maintainer) that the parameter is intentionally not
>> used?
>
> Our code has the following macro, designed to defeat even the smartest
> optimizing compiler:
>
> #define USE(x) {Int _y_ = ((Int)(long)&_y_, x, 1);}
>
> It also has simpler versions of the macro for compilers that don't
> need the complexity.
>
> --
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >-Wall (From: Stuart Malin <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: -Wall (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: -Wall (From: Stuart Malin <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: -Wall (From: "Mark Wagner" <email@hidden>) |