• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: int128_t
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: int128_t


  • Subject: Re: int128_t
  • From: "Sherm Pendley" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:47:20 -0400

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:45 AM, <email@hidden> wrote:
Maybe you were thinking of 128 bit long doubles ?

we already use the 128 long doubles, the thing is we do a lot of accounting like
calculations and 'almost accurate' is not an option :-)

Don't use floats or doubles of *any* size for financial applications. See Goldberg's classic paper on the subject:

    <http://docs.sun.com/source/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html>
 
64 bit integers work great for that matter, but we like to step up to more bits

Don't bother. As Paul said, 64 bit is enough to represent any amount you're going to encounter in real life.

sherm--

--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: int128_t
      • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
References: 
 >int128_t (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: int128_t (From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>)
 >Re: int128_t (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: compiling assembler in Xcode
  • Next by Date: Re: int128_t
  • Previous by thread: Re: int128_t
  • Next by thread: Re: int128_t
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread