Re: int128_t
Re: int128_t
- Subject: Re: int128_t
- From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:55:23 +0200
Le 17 oct. 08 à 15:47, Sherm Pendley a écrit : On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:45 AM, <email@hidden> wrote: Maybe you were thinking of 128 bit long doubles ?
calculations and 'almost accurate' is not an option :-) 64 bit integers work great for that matter, but we like to step up to more bits
Don't bother. As Paul said, 64 bit is enough to represent any amount you're going to encounter in real life.
sherm--
At least until we got generic processors that natively support 128 bits integers ;-)
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden