• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ?


  • Subject: Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ?
  • From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:09:52 -0500
  • Organization: Rogue Research Inc.

On 12/4/09 9:33 AM, CSights said:

>	In case you're curious, the only reason I care about this is because I want
>the program output match when the program is run on a 32bit and 64bit
machine
>for debugging purposes.  (It is easier to debug on my home computer!)

Well, you'll probably need to update your code.  There are differences
between 32 and 64 bit, there have to be, that's the whole idea! :)

>	I take it the default behavior in 10.4 (g++ version 4.0.1) was to
>compile for
>32-bit architectures?

In 10.5 and earlier, the default was to build 32 bit binaries.

--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 email@hidden
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ? (From: CSights <email@hidden>)
 >Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ? (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ? (From: CSights <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: wprintf does not honor "Typecheck calls to printf/scanf" setting
  • Next by Date: XCode Jump To Definition
  • Previous by thread: Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ?
  • Next by thread: Re: wrong value for LONG_MAX (9223372036854775807 rather than 2147483647) on macintosh 10.6 ?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread