• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Why can't I Run > Fix?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why can't I Run > Fix?


  • Subject: Re: Why can't I Run > Fix?
  • From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:46:47 -0700


On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:

I personally don't expect the problems to really go away as long as Apple's
using the GCC tool chain--although they have certainly worked to improve
things over the years, and those improvements are *much* appreciated. I hope
to see LLVM replace GCC in Xcode sooner rather than later.

Don't expect too much, the Mac OS X linker is not part of GCC.

The compiler can still help by generating fewer symbols. Linking C++ is massively I/O bound due to the huge size of the input files.


—Jens _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Why can't I Run > Fix? (From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Why can't I Run > Fix? (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: XCode, libs and SNMP
  • Next by Date: Re: Generating a parseable #include dependency graph from a project?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Why can't I Run > Fix?
  • Next by thread: Re: Why can't I Run > Fix?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread