Re: Universal Builds
Re: Universal Builds
- Subject: Re: Universal Builds
- From: koko <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:51:20 -0600
So I take it that building ppc, i386 and x86_64 gets me where I need, my ppc need is way old macs of old customers.
I found that with x86_64 with deployment of 10.5 and SDK of 10.6 I get a crash on 10.5.8 with symbols not being in the correct framework. So I need to be aware of that as well.
-koko
On Aug 4, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 23:19:34 -0700, Wade Tregaskis said:
>
>> 'ppc64' is kind of an odd case... there's very few scenarios in which
>> it's actually useful, since pervasive 64-bit support (in system
>> libraries etc) didn't really come in until Intel. There were also some
>> nasty practical issues with using it, I seem to remember, though the
>> details escape me for the moment.
>
> The only place ppc64 is useful is if you have an app that needs more than 4 GB of virtual memory. We ship an app that is ppc64 & x86_64 only, and the ppc64 stuff works quite well in 10.5.8. Still, it is the buggiest of the 4 Mac architectures.
>
> Also note that 10.5 was the last SDK to support ppc64.
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden