Re: CLang wrong analysis?
Re: CLang wrong analysis?
- Subject: Re: CLang wrong analysis?
- From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:15:36 -0400
- Organization: Rogue Research Inc.
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:05:47 -0300, Bavarious said:
>This is a CSA bug that has already been reported and fixed by the LLVM team:
>
>http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9541
>
>As described in the bug report, you can define the variable inside the
>for expression as a workaround for this static analyser bug, or you
>could wait until Apple release another version of Xcode+Clang including
>the fix.
Or build a newer version of the analyzer yourself and redirect Xcode to
use it:
<http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/xcode.html>
Assuming those instructions still work for Xcode 4 (anyone tried?), but
they certainly work for 3.
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden