• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CLang wrong analysis?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CLang wrong analysis?


  • Subject: Re: CLang wrong analysis?
  • From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:15:36 -0400
  • Organization: Rogue Research Inc.

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:05:47 -0300, Bavarious said:

>This is a CSA bug that has already been reported and fixed by the LLVM team:
>
>http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9541
>
>As described in the bug report, you can define the variable inside the
>for expression as a workaround for this static analyser bug, or you
>could wait until Apple release another version of Xcode+Clang including
>the fix.

Or build a newer version of the analyzer yourself and redirect Xcode to
use it:
<http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/xcode.html>

Assuming those instructions still work for Xcode 4 (anyone tried?), but
they certainly work for 3.

--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 email@hidden
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: CLang wrong analysis?
      • From: Jean-Denis Muys <email@hidden>
References: 
 >CLang wrong analysis? (From: Jean-Denis Muys <email@hidden>)
 >Re: CLang wrong analysis? (From: Bavarious <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How to get warnings for missing methods in older SDKs
  • Next by Date: Re: How to get warnings for missing methods in older SDKs
  • Previous by thread: Re: CLang wrong analysis?
  • Next by thread: Re: CLang wrong analysis?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread